Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja has struck out a suit instituted in 2019 against President Muhammadu Buhari, Dr. Pius Odubu, and Olorogun Bernard Okumagba, to challenge the appointment of Odubu and Olorogun Bernard Okumagba as Chairman and Managing Director respectively of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) in October 2019.
The suit instituted by an Abuja-based businesswoman, Chief Mrs Rita Lori Ogbebor, was struck out by the Court on the grounds that the plaintiff has no locus standi to institute the case.
The court held that section 2 of the NDDC Act 2000 was so specific that any legal action on any infraction in matters relating to NDDC can only be instituted by corporate persons and not individuals like the plaintiff.
The Judge held that the law was clear that the power to file any case to challenge infractions in the NDDC cannot be delegated by proxy to anybody.
New NDDC Board Won’t Disappoint Niger Deltans – Minister
South-South forum decries delay in confirmation of NDDC board nominees
Mrs. Ogbebor who claimed to be a stakeholder from Itsekiri extraction had dragged President Muhammadu Buhari, NDDC, Senate, Dr Pius Odubu, Olorogun Bernard Okumagba, and the Attorney General of the Federation before the court in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1069/2019.
The woman prayed the court to invoke Section 4 and 12 of the NDDC Act to order President Buhari to appoint indigenes of oil-producing areas of Delta State as Chairman, in specific compliance with section 4.
The plaintiff also prayed for another order compelling Buhari to appoint Itsekiri indigene from oil-producing areas of Delta State as the Managing Director of the NDDC.
However, the defendants in the preliminary objections challenged the legal right of the plaintiff to have instituted the action.
The defendants averred that section 2 of the NDDC act is so specific that only corporate persons can institute action where infractions occur.
In the judgement delivered on Thursday, the court upheld the preliminary objections of the defendants and held that the plaintiff lacked legal right to have brought the case before the court.
Justice Ekwo said: “The consequence of lack of locus standi is dire and the courts have been unwavering in making pronouncements on it. It is the law that the claim must be struck out when a plaintiff is found to be lacking locus standi. I am bound to follow the law, and I hereby make an order striking out the case of the plaintiff.”