Referees’ chief Howard Webb says West Ham should not have been awarded a penalty during Erik ten Hag’s final game in charge of Manchester United on 27 October.
The Hammers were given the decision on the recommendation of video assistant referee Michael Oliver following Matthijs de Ligt’s challenge on Danny Ings.
David Coote, the on-field referee, had waved play on following the incident but awarded a penalty after reviewing the incident on the pitchside monitor.
Jarrod Bowen scored the penalty, sealing a 2-1 win for West Ham. Ten Hag was sacked less than 24 hours later.
- FG suspends 13 students for assaulting schoolmate
- Lakurawa wants a caliphate in the Sahel – Dr Rufa’i
“I thought it was a misread by the VAR,” Webb told Sky Sports’ Mic’d Up programme.
“A VAR that’s normally really talented and reliable, but gets uber-focused in this situation on De Ligt’s leg. His leg coming through on to Danny Ings, not making any contact with the ball. The ball’s already past De Ligt as he makes contact with Danny Ings.
“And the VAR sees that as a clear foul. I think he was too focused on that aspect. I don’t think he should have got involved.
“I think this is a situation where we’d leave the on-field decision as it is, probably whichever way it’s called. On balance, I don’t think it’s a penalty kick.”
On-field referees are not required to follow the recommendations of the VAR official.
Webb, who is chief of refereeing body PGMOL, was speaking publicly for the first time since Coote was suspended with immediate effect after he appeared to make derogatory comments about Liverpool and their former manager Jurgen Klopp in a video that circulated online.
Join Daily Trust WhatsApp Community For Quick Access To News and Happenings Around You.
