European football governing body, UEFA and other top clubs in Europe have all pledged their commitment to the existing competitions they play in while rejecting the European Super League concept following Thursday’s European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling.
On Thursday, judges said UEFA rules blocking the formation of a new competition, such as the European Super League, were contrary to EU law – but added that the competition may still not be approved.
UEFA said: “The ECJ has certainly not given green light nor approved project like the so-called Super League. We welcome the clarity that the ECJ has delivered today including an endorsement of pre-authorisation system and UEFA’s dual role as organising and authorising body.
The Premier League said: “The ruling does not endorse the so-called ‘European Super League’ and the Premier League continues to reject any such concept.
- Five ways to have memorable yuletide celebration without breaking the bank
- Colloquium where Nigeria’s economic history was reviewed
Manchester United released a statement on Thursday saying they “remain fully committed to participation in UEFA competitions”, while Manchester City and Tottenham said they are “committed to the values of European football”.
A Chelsea statement said: “The judgement issued today does not change Chelsea’s position”.
Arsenal then announced on Friday morning that their position “has not changed”. Liverpool are yet to release a statement following Thursday’s ruling.
AC Milan said: “FC Internazionale Milano reiterates its position that European football’s future well-being can only be secured by clubs working together through the ECA, in partnership and collaboration with UEFA and FIFA.
“As a Club, we remain committed to the values that underpin the European Sports Model and to working through the ECA alongside our fellow clubs to uphold those values.
The latest vision of the European Super League (ESL), backed only by Barcelona and Real Madrid, was announced immediately after top EU judges said Uefa rules blocking competition were contrary to law.
