Let us look beyond the military to tackle insurgency, banditry

Looking at the key variables in the Nigerian security challenges, it  seems practically and strategically impossible to expect a quick and decisive resolution of these challenges militarily. And this is why.

First, the factors that made the Customs to fail in its duty of stopping contraband weapons from entering the country; that made Immigration to fail in its duty of stopping illegal aliens from entering the country; that made DSS to fail in its duty of detecting, filtering and stopping evil men from conspiring, plotting and executing their evil plots in society; that made NIA to fail in its duty of halting and neutralizing foreign agencies from collaborating with the local evils in our country; and that made police to fail in their duty of arresting and prosecuting perpetrators of such crimes – all building up to the violent state where military actions became needed – these same factors will likewise make the military to also fail in its duty of defeating and submerging insurgency and banditry because the military is also operating under the same environment as its sister security agencies. Already, it is 12 years since military action is unleashed in fighting BH and the problem is still very much with us.

• 100 northerners leave Imo as 8 killed, 6 injured in fresh attack
  FG plans new salary package for judges

Second, with regards to herdsmen banditry, the military must have to be thinned out almost to a soldier over a widespread area to engage them since they are all nomads and are virtually everywhere. Such bandits can provoke and sustain a long-drawn guerrilla warfare.

As a country, we don’t need it as it will be both a serious debilitating political, social, economic and diplomatic destabiliser and a huge resource draining adventure on the nation.

We, therefore, need a political rather than military solution to the problem where possible (not that we have no trust or confidence in our military men and women; we do, but the solution to the issues is far beyond conventional military approach). Engaging in a “National Dialogue’’ to create a “New National Rebirth’’ is by far more guaranteeing and rewarding than applied military actions.

That is what the “Gumi-Obasanjo Initiative’’ as agreed to in Abeokuta on Sunday, April 4, seeks to achieve. It seeks to end herdsmen banditry and engender peace by engagement. And I think this also fits well into the recurrent national restructuring resonance the way l understand it.

The Nigerian government is thus most advised to key into it, adopt, refine and expand it into a comprehensive national dialogue for the resolution of violent insecurity and all other contentious fundamental national issues in a new national rebirth platform.

And no one is most fit to lead this platform than President Olusegun Obasanjo himself. I believe this is the way to go if Nigeria must cross the threshold of conducting a credible transitional elections in 2023 and remain steadfast as a single nation state, avoiding chaos and more bloodshed.”

Umar Ardo, Ph.D wrote from Abuja